The Diversity of Cuculiform and Piciform Species in Partly Transformed Riparian Zambezi Forest

  • G. Kopij Department of Integrated Environmental Science Ogongo Campus University of Namibia, Private Bag 5520 Oshakati, Namibia
Keywords: bioindicators, Namibia, population densities, territoriality, tropical riparian forests

Abstract

Both cuculiform and piciform species can be used as bioindicators and, to a lesser extent, as umbrella species. A territory mapping method was employed in 2015 to assess their population densities in a riparian forest on the Zambezi River near Katima Mulilo, NENamibia. The forest, c. 280 ha in surface area, was partly transformed by human settlement and croplands. A total of 9 cuculiform and 6 piciform species were recorded. Population densities (male’s territories per 100 ha) were assessed as follow: Diederick, Klaas’s and Jacobin Cuckoo — each one with 1.1, African Emerald and African Black Cuckoo — each one with 0.7, Red-chested Cuckoo — 0.4; Senegal Coucal — 4.3, White-browed and Coppery-tailed Coucals — each one with 0.7;  Bearded Woodpecker — 1.8, Golden-tailed Woodpecker — 1.1, Cardinal Woodpecker — 0.4; Black-collared Barbet — 5.7, Crested Barbet — 0.7, and Yellow-fronted Tinkerbird — 1.8. Both cuculiform and woodpecker species avoided built-up areas in the man-modified riparian forest, while all barbet species appeared to prefer them. Chrysococcyx cuckoos are not territorial in respect to Cuculus/Clamator cuckoos. The latter ones are, however, territorial in respect to other species from the same genera. Coucals display territorialism in regard to members of other species of the genus Centropus.

References

Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A., Mustoe, S. 2012. Bird Census Techniques, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London.

Chittenden, H., Davis, G., Weiersbye, I. 2016. Roberts' Bird Guide. John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town.

Caro, T. M. 2003. Umbrella species, critique and lesson from East Africa. Animal Conservation, 6, 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943003003214

Drever, M., Aitken, K. E. H., Norris, A. R., Martin, K. 2008. Woodpeckers as reliable indicators of bird richness, forest health and harvest. Biological Conservation, 141, 624-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.004

Fry, C. H., Stuart, K., Urban, E. 1982-2004. The birds of Africa. Vol. 1-7. Academic Press, Cambridge (MA, USA).

Hockey, P. A. R., Dean, W. R. J., Ryan, P. G., Maree, S., Brickman, B. M., eds. 2005. Roberts' Birds of Southern Africa. John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town.

Kofron, C. P., Chapman, A. 1995. Deforestation and bird species composition in Liberia, West Africa. Tropical Zoology, 8 (2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/03946975.1995.10539284

Kopij, G. 2000. Birds of Maseru. NUL Journal of Research (Roma, Lesotho), 8, 104-151.

Kopij, G. 2001 a. Atlas of Birds of Bloemfontein. Department of Biology, National University of Lesotho/Free State Bird Club. (Lesotho)/Bloemfontein (RSA).

Kopij, G. 2001 b. Birds of Roma Valley, Lesotho. Roma. Department of Biology, National University of Lesotho, Roma (Lesotho).

Kopij, G. 2014. Avian Assemblages in Urban Habitats in North-central Namibia. International Science & Technology Journal of Namibia, 3 (1), 64-81.

Kopij, G. 2015. Avian diversity in an urbanized South African grassland. Zoology & Ecology, 25 (2), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2015.1013744

Kopij, G. 2016. Birds of Katima Mulilo town, Zambezi Region, Namibia. International Science & Technology Journal of Namibia, 7, 85-102.

Kopij, G. 2017. Structure of avian assemblages in Zambezian Baikiaeae woodlands, northern Namibia. Zoology & Ecology, 27, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2016.1245933

Kopij, G. (2018 c): Population density, and community structure of birds breeding in Mopane Savanna of the Ogongo Game а де а?Park, north-central Namibia. International Journal of Science & Technology of Namibia, 12, 117-134.

Kopij, G. 2018 b. Atlas of birds of Kasane town, NE Botswana. Babbler, 64, 3-15.

Kopij, G. 2018 c. Provisional atlas of breeding birds of Swakopmund in the coastal Namib Desert. Lanioturdus, 51 (2), 2-12.

Mendelsohn, J., Jarvis, A., Roberts, C., Robertson, T. 2009. Atlas of Namibia. A Portrait of the Land and its People. Sunbird Publishers, Cape Town.

Mikusiński, G., Gromadzki, M, Chylarecki, P. 2001. Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conservation Biology, 15, 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x

Møller, A. P., Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Mousseau, T., Su. T., Zhou, B., Tryjanowski, P., Liang, W. 2017. Multiple species of cuckoos as superior predictors of bird species richness in Asia. Ecosphere, 8 (11), e02003.10.1002/ec2.2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2003

Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Moravec, D., Jerzak, L., Tryjanowski, P., Liang, W., Møller, A. P. 2019. Global congruence between cuckoo species richness and biodiversity hotspots. Biodiversity Conservation, 232, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.025

Parker, V. 2013. Population densities of woodland bird species at the Pretoria National Botanical Garden. Ornithological Observations, 4, 94-103.

Sutherland, W. J. 1996. Ecological Census Techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (U.K.).

Seymour, C. L., Simmons, R. E. 2008. Can severely fragmented patches of riparian vegetation still be important for arid-land bird diversity. Journal of Arid Environment, 72, 2275-2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.07.014

Virkkala, R. 2006. Why study woodpeckers in forest ecosystem. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 43, 82-85.

Published
2020-05-05
How to Cite
Kopij, G. (2020). The Diversity of Cuculiform and Piciform Species in Partly Transformed Riparian Zambezi Forest. Zoodiversity, 54(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.15407/zoo2020.02.147