The Importance of Artificial Wetlands in the Conservation of Wetland Birds and the Impact of Land Use Attributes Around the Wetlands: a Study from the Ajara Conservation Reserve, Western Ghats, India

  • S. Patil Department of Zoology, Jaysingpur College Jaysingpur, Dist.: Kolhapur (MS), India
  • K. Choudaj Department of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
Keywords: agriculture, aquatic birds, exotic plantations, forest, human, wetland ecosystem


Artificial wetlands are built to meet the rising human population's water needs, with little attention paid to their ecological significance. The current study was carried out to assess the importance of artificial wetlands in biodiversity conservation. Habitat quality of wetlands was assessed using the birds as an ecological indicator. Bird surveys were carried out at the five artificial wetlands located in the Ajara conservation reserve, northern Western Ghats, India. Bird surveys were conducted for five years (2011–2015). During the study, 165 bird species were recorded, including 34 wetland birds and 131 wetland-associated birds. Wetlands in forested areas have a higher richness of wetland birds. Wetlands surrounded by exotic plantations, agriculture, and human settlements exhibit lower wetland bird richness than wetlands in forested areas. Land use attributes around the wetlands affect wetland bird diversity. The current study gives a glimpse that these artificial wetlands could serve as a possible habitat for wetland birds.


Ali, S. 2002. The book of Indian birds. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, 1-326.

Bassi, N., Kumar, M. D., Sharma, A., et al. 2014. Status of Wetlands in India: A Review of Extent, Ecosystem Benefits, Threats and Management Strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2, 1-19.

Bellio, M. G., Kingsford, R. T., Kotagama, S. W. 2009. Natural versus artificial‐ wetlands and their waterbirds in Sri Lanka. Biological Conservation, 142, 3076-3085.

Bilgrami, K. S. 1995. Concept and conservation of biodiversity. CBS Publishers and Distributors, Delhi.

Champion, H. G., Seth, S. K. 1968. A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India. Govt. of India Press, New Delhi.

Choudaj, K., Wankhade, V. 2021. Reduction in avian diversity due to exotic tree plantations on the native savannas of Pune City, India. Tropical Ecology, 62, 499-507.

Cody, M. L. 1981. Habitat Selection in Birds: The Roles of Vegetation Structure, Competitors, and Productivity. BioScience, 31 (2), 107-113.

Findlay, C., Bourdages, J. 2001. Response Time of Wetland Biodiversity to Road Construction on Adjacent Lands. Conservation Biology, 14, 86-94.

Gibbs, J. P. 1993. Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands, 13, 25-31.

Giosa, E., Mammides, C., Zotos, S. 2018. The importance of artificial wetlands for birds: A case study from Cyprus. PLoS ONE, 13 (5), e0197286.

Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., Inskipp, T. 2011. Birds of the Indian subcontinent, Oxford University Press, London.

Houlahan, J., Keddy, P., Makkay, K., et al. 2006. The effects of adjacent land use on wetland species richness and community composition. Wetlands, 26, 79-96. (Accessed on 16/06/2022)[79:TEOALU]2.0.CO;2

Jaksic, F. 2004. El Nino effects on avian ecology: Lesson learned from South-eastern pacific. Ornithologia Neotropical, 15, 61-72.

Lagos, N.A., Paolini, P., Jaramillo, E., et al. 2008. Environmental processes, water quality degradation and decline of water bird populations in the Rio Cruses wetland, Chile. Wetlands, 28, 938-950.

Ma, Z., Li, B., Zhao, B., et al. 2004. Are artificial wetlands good alternatives to natural wetlands for waterbirds? - A case study on Chongming Island, China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 333-350.

Mahabal, A., Pande, S., Pandit, P., et al. 2012. Aves. In: Anonymous, eds. Fauna of Maharashtra, State Fauna Series 20 (Part-1). Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, 147-188.

Mitsch, W., Gosselink, J. 2000. The Value of Wetlands: Importance of Scale and Landscape Setting. Ecological Economics, 35, 25-33.

Paracuellos, M. 2006. How can habitat selection affect the use of a wetland complex by waterbirds?. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 4569-4582.

Patil, S. R., Patil, S. S., Sathe, T. V. 2014. Status of freshwater bodies from Ajara tahsil of Kolhapur district (MS), India with special reference to morphometric characteristics. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 8 (9), 31-37.

Patil, S. R., Choudaj, K. 2022. Reptilian assemblages in the wetlands of Amboli hill complex, northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra, India during the monsoon season. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 14 (2), 20576-20583.

Prasad, S. N., Sengupta, T., Kumar, A., et al. 2015. Wetland of India. energy/water/paper/ wet-lands/impacts.html.

Praveen, J., Jayapal, R., Pittie, A. 2016. A checklist of the birds of India. Indian Birds, 11(5&6), 113-172.

Ramachandra, T.V. 2006. Soil and Groundwater Pollution from Agricultural Activities, Commonwealth of learning. Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi.

Sliva, L., Williams, D. 2001. Buffer Zone Versus Whole Catchment Approaches to Studying Land Use Impact on River Water Quality. Water research, 35, 3462-3472.

Steward, R. E. Jr. 2007. Technical aspects of wetlands: Wetlands as bird habitat. United States Geological Survey Water supply Paper, 24-25.

Zhijun, M., Yinting, C., Bo, L., et al. 2010. Managing wetland habitats for waterbirds: An international perspective. Wetlands, 30, 15-27.

How to Cite
Patil, S., & Choudaj, K. (2023). The Importance of Artificial Wetlands in the Conservation of Wetland Birds and the Impact of Land Use Attributes Around the Wetlands: a Study from the Ajara Conservation Reserve, Western Ghats, India. Zoodiversity, 57(1).