Fine-scale butterfly community and trait diversity in a structurally complex urban green space in West London

Keywords: Urban ecology, Lepidoptera, biodiversity, phenotype, species richness

Abstract

Urban and peri-urban landscapes represent increasingly important reservoirs for biodiversity conservation, yet our understanding of community structure and genetic variation maintenance in these fragmented environments remains limited. I investigated butterfly communities and wing pattern polymorphism across four structurally distinct habitats (grassland, hedgerow, woodland edge, and woodland) within a 10ha peri-urban site in West London. Over two summer months, standardized transect surveys recorded 2,786 individuals representing 23 species. Woodland edge and hedgerow habitats supported the highest diversity (21 species each), while grassland and woodland showed lower richness (17 and 13 species respectively). Five species dominated the community, with Maniola jurtina (Meadow Brown) and Aphantopus hyperantus (Ringlet) comprising 51% of total abundance. Mendelian analysis of wing spot polymorphism in these focal species revealed inheritance patterns consistent with dihybrid F2 expectations, independent of habitat context but showing significant sexual dimorphism in M. jurtina. These findings demonstrate that small, structurally complex peri-urban habitats can maintain both species-level and genetic diversity, highlighting their conservation value and the importance of preserving habitat heterogeneity in urban planning strategies.

 

References

Baerwaerts, K., VanDyck, H., VanDongen, S. &Matthysen, E. 1998. Morphological and genetic variation in the Speckled Wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.) among differently fragmented landscapes. Netherlands Journal of Ecology, 48 (3), 241-253.

https://doi.org/10.1163/156854298X00093

Bennie, J., Huntley, B., Wiltshire, A., Hill, M. O. & Baxter, R. 2008. Slope, aspect and climate: spatially explicit and implicit models of topographic microclimate in chalk grassland. Ecological Modelling, 216 (1), 47-59.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.04.010

Brakefield, P. M. 1979. Spot-number in Maniola jurtina-variation between generations and selection in marginal populations. Heredity, 42 (2), 259-266.

https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1979.27

Brakefield, P. M. & French, V. 1993. Butterfly wing patterns. Acta Biotheoretica, 41 (4), 447-468.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709376

Creed, E. R., Ford, E. B. & McWhirter, K. G. 1964. Evolutionary studies on Maniola jurtina: The Isles of Scilly, 1958-59. Heredity, 19 (3), 471-488.

https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1964.55

Creed, E. R., Dowdeswell, W. H., Ford, E. B. & McWhirter, K. G. 1970. Evolutionary studies on Maniola jurtina Lepidoptera: Satyridae: the 'boundary phenomenon' in southern England. In: Hecht, M. K. & Steere, W. C. (Eds.), Essays in Evolution and Genetics. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, 263-287.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9585-4_9

Denis, M. & Schiffermüller, I. 1775. Ankündungeines systematischen Werkes von den Schmetterlingen der Wienergegend. Bernardi, Vienna, 1-322.

Dennis, R. L. H., Dapporto, L., Dover, J. W. & Shreeve, T. G. 2013. Corridors and barriers in biodiversity conservation: a novel resource-based habitat perspective for butterflies. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22 (12), 2709-2734.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0540-2

Dowdeswell, W. H., Ford, E. B. & McWhirter, K. G. 1960. Further studies on the evolution of Maniola jurtina in the Isles of Scilly. Heredity, 14 (3), 333-364.

https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1960.34

Dunning, J. B., Danielson, B. J. & Pulliam, H. R. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65, 169-175.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3544901

Esper, E.J.C. 1777. Die Schmetterlinge in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. Theil 1, Band 1. Wolfgang Walther, Erlangen, 1-388.

https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.152936

Essens, T., van Langevelde, F., Vos, R. A., van Swaay, C. A. M. & WallisDeVries, M. F. 2017. Ecological determinants of butterfly vulnerability across the European continent. Journal of Insect Conservation, 21 (3), 439-450.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9972-4

Gilchrist, G. 1990. The consequences of sexual dimorphism in body size for butterfly flight and thermoregulation. Functional Ecology, 4, 475-487.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2389315

Kharouba, H. M. & Vellend, M. 2015. Flowering time of butterfly nectar food plants is more sensitive to temperature than the timing of butterfly adult flight. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84 (5), 1311-1321.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12373

Knoch, A.W. 1782. Beiträge zur Insectenfauna von Teutschland. Zweiter Band. Friedrich Wilhelm Iversen, Leipzig, 1-124.

Lebeau, J., Wesselingh, R. A. & Van Dyck, H. 2015. Butterfly density and behaviour in uncut hay meadow strips: behavioural ecological consequences of an agri-environmental scheme. PLoS ONE, 10 (8), e0134945.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134945

Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. 10th Edition, Volume I. Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae (Stockholm), 1-824.

https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

Linnaeus, C. 1761. Fauna Svecica. Second edition. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm, 1-578 .

Linnaeus, C. 1771. Mantissa Plantarum Altera. Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae (Stockholm), 1-588.

McDermott Long, O., Warren, R., Price, J., Brereton, T. M., Botham, M. S. & Franco, A. M. A. 2017. Sensitivity of UK butterflies to local climatic extremes: which life stages are most at risk? Journal of Animal Ecology, 86 (1), 108-116.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12594

Newland, D., Still, R., Swash, A. & Tomlinson, D. 2015. Britain's Butterflies: A Field Guide to the Butterflies of Britain and Ireland. 3rd ed. WILDGuides Ltd, Old Basing, 1-240.

Ochsenheimer, F. 1808. Die Schmetterlinge von Europa. Band 2. Gerhard Fleischer dem Jüngeren, Leipzig, 1-288.

https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50612

Poda von Neuhaus, N. 1761. Insecta Musei Graecensis. Widmanstad, Grätz, 1-127.

Pollard, E. & Yates, T. J. 1993. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman and Hall, London, 1-274.

Rottemburg, S.A. von 1775. Anmerkungen zu den Hufnagelischen Tabellen. 6. Die Papillons. Der Naturforscher, 6, 1-34.

Saccheri, I., Kuussaari, M., Kankare, M., Vikman, P., Fortelius, W. & Hanski, I. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature, 392 (6675), 491-494.

https://doi.org/10.1038/33136

Seppänen, R. 1981. Differences in spotting pattern between populations of Aphantopus hyperantus Lepidoptera, Satyridae in southern Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 18, 1-36.

Shapiro, A. M. & Carde, R. T. 1970. Habitat selection and competition among sibling species of satyrid butterflies. Evolution, 24, 48-54.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1970.tb01739.x

Van Dyck, H. & Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic and Applied Ecology, 6 (6), 535-545.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.03.005

Wiklund, C. & Karlsson, B. 1988. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to fecundity in some Swedish Satyrid butterflies. The American Naturalist, 131 (1), 132-138.

https://doi.org/10.1086/284779

Published
2026-03-04
How to Cite
Bangay, R. (2026). Fine-scale butterfly community and trait diversity in a structurally complex urban green space in West London. Zoodiversity, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.15407/zoo2026.02.127